Is Stripping in Airplane Fun?

July 19th, 2008 by anythingfun

A man, with possibly mental illness, stripped down on airplane causing the flight to be diverted. The American Air flight number 725 from Boston to LA had to make stop in Oklahoma City to remove the man. Not only he stripped naked, he also tried to open the emergency exit door. He was brought down and tied to his seat by several passangers, some of them are members of New England Revolution of Major League Soccer. They were on their way to Southern California for a game on Sunday against Chivas USA at California State University, Fullerton.

For complete story, visit: http://sports.yahoo.com/sow/news?slug=capress-soc_mls_flight_diverted&prov=capress&type=lgns

Crazy FUN Games

June 24th, 2008 by anythingfun

Found this post about crazy Japanese show. I missed watching it on TV, but I watched the clips on abc’s website. So funny, I’ll make sure I watch it next week.

Heh, who knows that I might participate in Hole in the Wall?! Watch me.

Fun Times Living in Dorms

March 5th, 2008 by anythingfun

Dorm-phone use drops as students rely on cells U.Va. cites wireless technology in telecommunications-income slump.
BY KATE ANDREWS

CHARLOTTESVILLE — Even on 20-degree days, University of Virginia students pause outside, checking their cell phones for messages and catching up with friends.

As the school — and the rest of America — becomes increasingly "wired," the use of traditional landlines is decreasing, according to U.Va.’s chief housing officer, Mark Doherty.

And that poses a difficulty for the university, which owns the phone service offered in its dorm rooms and gains money from each long-distance call made on those lines.

Income from long-distance calls covers U.Va.’s contract payment to MCI, but the money no longer goes far enough to pay for technology updates in the dorms, as it did a decade ago.

"The volume of student long-distance calling has been dropping for many years," said James A. Jokl, director of U.Va.’s communications and systems. "I suspect many reasons, including e-mail and calling cards in the past and additionally cell phones more recently."

In the 1997-98 academic year, students spent more than 5 million minutes making long-distance calls. That rate fell to 600,000 minutes last year, bringing in only $30,000.

Dan Bowman, a junior who lives off campus, has used his cell phone as his primary means of phone communication since he came to U.Va. "I never used my dorm phone," he said. "Very rarely do people use dorm phones, especially upperclassmen." Neither Bowman nor his roommates have a landline in their home, because all have cell phones.

Crystal Campbell, a second-year student who lives in a dorm, juggles two phones as a way to save money. Often, she will give her cell number to a friend, and when the friend calls, Campbell will ask her to dial her room phone number. "If I’m low on minutes," she said, "I use my dorm phone."

In 1992, U.Va. began adding to its existing phone service as a larger project installing data, voice mail and video services in residence halls. All dorms also have high-speed Internet connections now.
In the early 1990s, U.Va.’s long-distance rates were competitive, Jokl said, and some of the income from student calls paid for the rewiring of dorms for the data network and phone service.

A contract with MCI through the Virginia Information Technologies Agency costs the university about 3 cents a minute for interstate calls and 3.4 cents a minute for in-state calls.

U.Va. charges 5 cents a minute for any long-distance call, a rate that will decrease to 4 cents in February.

But it’s difficult to beat free long distance on a cell phone or low rates from phone cards, Doherty acknowledged. The university’s income from dorm phone calls now just covers the cost of providing phone service.

Many students don’t even bother signing up for a long-distance policy on their dorm phones.

But housing and technology officials have done some brainstorming. One idea is for the university to offer students cell phones, although that may be unrealistic because many students come to school already equipped with them.

Officials also are working with phone service providers to improve cell reception inside dorm rooms — a significant problem inside the steel-and-concrete McCormick Road residence halls. The university may install antennas in the buildings.

"We don’t have plans for significant changes now," Jokl said, "but we, like most other schools, always ponder what we’ll be able to do in the future."

Kate Andrews is a staff writer at The Daily Progress in Charlottesville.

Which One is More Fun: Having 50″ Plasma TV or Sex?

February 9th, 2008 by anythingfun

Apparently about 50% of UK men thinks that 50" Plasma TV is worth giving up sex for 6 months, where only 33% of UK women agrees.

.

Read full article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23070437/

.

Tell me what you think.

Cancer isnt Fun

January 24th, 2008 by anythingfun

What’s around you might cause cancer. Lets take asbestos for example, the fiber plastic that’s used for construction can cause mesothelioma, a rare lung cancer. It’s not fun right? To find out more visit: http://mesothelioma101.blogdrive.com

Stay out of cancer!

Coca-Cola launches Lucky-Draw and Redemption Campaign Giving out Cars, Cell Phones & Phone Cards

January 5th, 2008 by anythingfun

Thailand, Coca-Cola has launched a major end-of-year lucky-draw and redemption campaign called "Coke - Chances for Everyone". The campaign offers prizes worth more than Bt6.5 million and is backed by a Bt30-million advertising and publicity budget. It began on early October and runs to mid-December 2007.

The promotion offers lucky draws for five Mazda 3 sports cars worth Bt899,000 each and 150 Samsung U600 mobile phones worth Bt13,900 each.

Consumers may also collect 10 bottle caps or can ring pulls and redeem them for a Samsung C140 mobile phone that comes with a 300-baht True Move phone card for only Bt1,190. A lucky draw for the Mazda 3 sports cars will be held every two weeks for the duration of the promotion and each week for the Samsung U600 mobile phones, with the first draw on October 15.

To participate, consumers must send one bottle cap or ring pull from a Coke, Coke Zero, Coke Light, Fanta or Sprite drink that has printed on the underside "Take a Chance or Redeem". They should place it in an envelope along with their name, address and telephone number and send it to "Coke - Chances For Everyone", to PO Box 9, Pathum Thani 12000.

Source: http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2007/10/03/2985944.htm

I wish Coca Cola had the same promotions here…

‘Price’ Winner Claims Car Was in Wreck

December 16th, 2007 by anythingfun

The price was all wrong for one contestant on "The Price Is Right," who claims the TV game show and its authorized auto dealership tried to pass off a rehabilitated wreck as a new car she won.

Donna Tillman said she won the 2004 Pontiac GTO Coupe during her June 28, 2004, appearance on the game show. But she was told after she paid the taxes and license fees that the vehicle that appeared on the stage had mechanical problems, according to a lawsuit filed on Thursday in Los Angeles.

When the car was delivered about eight weeks later, it was not the model that had been displayed on the show and it had more miles on the odometer than the car she had been promised.

Several months later when Tillman took her prize for a service at a dealership in her hometown of Puyallup, Washington, she learned the car had major damage to its frame that had been repaired and concealed, the lawsuit said.

Tom George, the owner of Pontiac dealership Thorson Motor Center, said Tillman received "a brand new car" and only claimed it had been previously damaged after she wrecked it herself.

"There is no record of it being in a wreck," George said.

A spokesman for Tillman said her minor fender bender led to discovery of the previous damage.

"It had been reconstructed underneath to look like a new vehicle but it was not," said law firm spokesman Geoff Dulebohn. "What is clear is that she did not receive a new car."

A spokeswoman for "The Price Is Right" had no comment.

"The Price is Right," which airs on the CBS television network, ranks as America’s longest-running game show and was hosted for 35 years by Bob Barker.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071215/en_nm/price_dc

That must be suck, but at least it’s a free car!

Snow Comes to Deserts of Dubai

December 2nd, 2007 by anythingfun

The largest Indoor Snow Park of the World opened in Dubai

Ski2_2Built on what was previously desert sand, the slopes will be covered with manufactured snow all year round. The area under snow is the equivalent of three football pitches, with runs built inside a giant, slanting metal tube around 25 floors high.

.

Ski6_1The centre has green, blue, red and black runs, chairlifts and snow patrols, like any other ski resort. The $272 million resort is the latest project in the Emirate, which is seeking to be a major tourism hub. The man-made ski resort with three times the size of football field will have snow all year around. "Snow in the desert is such a unique experience for locals who have never seen snow," said Ski Dubai’s chief executive, Phil Taylor.

Ski Dubai has to cope with an average outside winter temperatures of 25C and summer temperatures soaring above 40C. The temperature inside is maintained at -1 or -2C.

.

Ski1_2Arabs who prefer to wear their traditional kandouras can hire black, knee-length padded coats for $35, included in entrance fee. Skiing in the robes is not allowed.
.
.
Ski4_1The 22,500 square meter of piste are covered with 6,000 metric tons of manufactured snow all year around. The snow is made by shooting water at high pressure into an atmosphere maintained at around freezing point by coolers both below and above the slopes.
.
.
Ski Dubai, 85m high by 80m wide, is the largest snowdome in the world, with the world’s third largest indoor ski slope.Ski5
Ski3_1.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Skiing in Desert, that’s FUN!
Source:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4491650.stm

This is NOT fun!

November 24th, 2007 by anythingfun

From a Felony to a Phone Call: Texas Prop 13 Will Allow Innocent Men to Be Jailed Without Bail

Texas voters will decide on November 6 whether to approve Proposition 13, a dangerous measure which will harm innocent men by greatly eroding the rights of those accused of domestic violence. The measure grants judges the ability to hold without bail those accused of nonviolent, trivial, or accidental violations of temporary restraining orders, as long as there is “evidence substantially showing the guilt of the accused.”

Restraining orders cut men off from their children and forbid them many routine behaviors. Men can and are arrested for violating their orders by such acts as: returning their children’s phone calls; going to their children’s school events; sending their kids birthday cards; or accidentally running into them at the park or the mall. Prop 13 doesn’t even make a distinction between long-term protection orders, where accused men have some (limited) ability to contest the charges, and ex parte temporary orders, which are often issued without even providing the man an opportunity to appear in court to defend himself.

According to the Texas House of Representatives’ House Research Organization, Prop 13’s proponents claim that accused men “would retain all their rights to due process and other protections. For example, the determination to deny bail would have to be made at a hearing in which the defendant could appeal the denial of bond or make a case for another bond.”

This ignores the fact that protective orders often seriously impair men’s ability to obtain legal representation and defend themselves. Protective orders make men homeless and can cut them off from their financial resources. In cases where they work with or near their wives, or operate businesses partly or wholly out of their homes, their incomes can disappear overnight. By contrast, women obtaining protective orders are afforded free legal services by victim advocates at local domestic violence shelters, and remain in the marital home. Prop 13 is reflective of a dangerous legal trend, and may victimize many innocent men and fathers.

Souce:
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=41307

This is so NOT FUN, say NO to Prop 13!

Jury Awards Abused McDonald’s Employee $6.1 Million

November 13th, 2007 by anythingfun

A Shepherdsville jury has awarded $6.1 million to a former McDonald’s employee, Louise Ogborn, who sued the company and the store’s assistant managers for being strip-searched, humiliated, and sodomized.

This case began from a call made from a man who impersonated a police officer, and convincing assistant manager, Donna Summers, that Ogborn had stolen money from a customer. The mysterious caller asked Summers to strip-search Ogborn. As the situation proceeded, a middle-aged man, Walter Nix Jr., came to the store to watch the search while continuing to the phone call with the mysterious caller.

When Nix took over the phone call, he continued to listen to the caller’s instructions, and Ogborn was further humiliated by having to jog in place with her hands in the air, do jumping jacks, stand on a chair. Nix also spanked Ogborn several times, and eventually ordered her to perform oral sex on him.

The abuse finally stopped when a maintance worker at the store took over the phone and refused to follow the caller’s instructions.
This whole incident was fully recorded on the security camera on the room.

The mysterious caller turned out to be David Stewart, a Florida correctional officer. He was charged with making the phone call. According to Ogborn’s lawyer, Stewart had been making this calls for 10 years, and some 70 stores in more than 30 states had led to criminal charges for more than one set of unwitting employees.

Mt. Washington police Detective Buddy Stump said, "[Stewart] was just a slick con man. He’d end up talking the manager into doing a strip search on the employee. His conversations generally lasted for quite some time — an hour-and-a-half to three hours." Stump found the evidence against Stewart after he traced a phone card used in the call to a store in Florida. An investigator there found surveillance video of a man they thought was Stewart buying the card, wearing a corrections uniform, and Stump flew down to assist in the arrest.

Stewart was charged with impersonating an officer, soliciting a sexual act and soliciting sexual abuse, but eventually became the only person charged in the incident to be acquitted.

Stewart’s defense attorney Steve Romines, at first insisted that it was unknown if the man shown on tape buying the calling card in question was actually Stewart. Then, when investigators claimed to find a calling card at Stewart’s home used in another of the hoax calls, Romines argued that having the card didn’t mean Stewart actually made the call. In the end, Romines convinced the jury that the evidence which did not include any witnesses or a recording of the caller’s voice was insufficient to convict Stewart.

Even after the acquittal, prosecutor Mike Mann continued to insist Stewart made the call. Meanwhile, Nix was later convicted of sex abuse, sexual misconduct and unlawful imprisonment and sentenced to five years after pleading guilty in the case.

The jury also found that McDonald’s was 50 percent at fault in the case, as was the caller, which will affect the amount apportioned. Ogborn claimed that McDonald’s did not sufficiently warn its employees of the ongoing hoax calls. McDonald’s attorneys claimed that the company had, but managers at the Mt. Washington store failed to relay the information.

Despite being sued by Ogborn, Summers also sued McDonald’s concurrently with Ogborn for $50 million. For the claim by Ogborn, the jury found that Summers and the other manager were not liable. On the other hand, the jury awarded $1.1 million to Summers from her claim agains’t McDonald’s, Summer said she’d use her settlement to take care of her family.

After the trial, Ogborn said she felt closure, and intends to go to law school. Her settlement includes $5 million in punitive and $1.1 million in compensatory damages.

Source:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21151994/

This case really shows that don’t trust people too easily….,  and it might not sound to be anything fun if it happen to you, BUT $6.1 million reward is pretty SWEET, isn’t it?